Alexander Pinwinkler

Commentary on the panel Ethnicity in Numbers: the Official Censuses, their Ethnic Categories, and the State Identity Politics, European Social Science History conference, Valencia, 30 March – 2 April 2016

Alexander Pinwinkler

Volume: X Issue: 2, Page(s): 5-10
Alexander Pinwinkler
University of Salzburg, Department of History, Salzburg, Austria
alexander.pinwinkler@sbg.ac.at


References

Anderson, Benedict R. O’G. (1991). Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Revised and extended. ed.). London: Verso.

Arel, D. (2002). “Language categories in censuses: backward- or forward-looking”. In Kertzer, D. I., Arel, D (Eds). Census and Identity. The Politics of Race, Ethnicity, and Language in National Censuses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 92-120.

Brix, E. (1982). Die Umgangssprachen in Altösterreich zwischen Agitation und Assimilation: die Sprachenstatistik in den zisleithanischen Volkszählungen 1880 bis 1910. Wien, Köln, Weimar: Böhlau Verlag.

Göderle, W. (2016). Zensus und Ethnizität. Zur Herstellung von Wissen über soziale Wirklichkeiten im Habsburgerreich zwischen 1848 und 1910. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.

Judson, P. M. (2006). Guardians of the Nation. Activists on the Language Frontiers of Imperial Austria. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.

Judson, P. M. (2016). The Habsburg Empire. A New History. Cambridge, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Schweber, L. (2006). Disciplining statistics: demography and vital statistics in France and England, 1830-1885. Durham, N.C., London: Duke University Press.

Stourzh, G. (2007). “Ethnic Attribution in Late Imperial Austria: Good Intentions, Evil Consequences”. In Stourzh, G. (Ed). From Vienna to Chicago and Back. Essays on Intellectual History and Political Thoughts in Europe and America. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 157-176.