Environmental portraits as means for depicting transnational families
Volume: XI Issue: 1
Babeş-Bolyai University, Centre for Population Studies, Avram Iancu str., 68, 400083, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, +40 7402787713
By examining interviews with photojournalists, research in visual anthropology and observations made during field study, it become clearer and clearer the need to identify a new method to convey the information regarding the difficulties transnational families deal with in everyday life.
This paper makes a case for the usage of environmental portraits as a means of study for the relationships between family members in transnational families, but also as a new method to disseminate the research results regarding transnational families from Romania. Environmental portraits are generally used by photojournalists to display their subjects in their natural environment and, in doing this, to give more information about their personality or about the issues they are dealing with. The method employs a new type of presenting the results to a wider public, in which environmental portraits are coupled with relevant quotes form interviews.
Keywords: visual methods, photography, photojournalism, environmental portraits, transnational families.
Banks, M. (1995). “Visual research methods”. Social Research Update 11: 1-6. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU11/.
Barthes, R. (1964). «Rhetorique de l’image». Communications 4 (1): 40-51.
Becker, H. S. (1974). “Photography and Sociology”. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication 1(1): 3-26.
Caldarola, V. (1985). “Visual Contexts: A Photographic Research Method in Anthropology”. Studies in Visual Communication 11(3): 33-53.
Dancu, A. (2009). “Investigating the social world”. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov 2(51): 15-21.
Douglis, P. N. (1997). “The environmental portrait: Blending subject and context to communicate”. Communication World: 51.
Time-Life Books (1972). Photojournalism. Time-Life Books, New York: Time-Life Books.
Edwards, E. (1992). Anthropology and photography 1860-1920. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Fyfe, G., John L. (1988). Picturing power: visual depiction and social relations. London: Routledge.
Goldberg, V. (1991). The Power of Photography. New York: Abbeville Press.
Hall, E. T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension. New York: Garden City.
Hughes, H. S. (2012). “Making a great environmental portrait”. Photo District News 32(2): 40-45.
Junker, D. (2012). “A picture is worth a thousand words: The importance of writing strong captions”. Public Relations Tactics 19 (2): 16-16.
Kobre, K. (2008). Photojournalism: the professionals’ approach. Boston: Focal Press.
Ludtke, M. (2006). “Introduction”. Nieman Reports: 4-5.
Salgado, S. (2006). “Migrations: The Story of Humanity on the Move”. Nienman Reports: 7-11.
Scherer, J. C. (1990). Special issue of Visual Anthropology: Picturing cultures: historical photographs in anthropological inquiry, Harwood Academic Publishers.
Schwartz, D. (1989). “Visual Etnography: Using Photography in Qualitative Research”. Qualitative Sociology 12 (2): 119-154.
Telegdi-Csetri, V. (2015). Dealing with difference by means of transnational families practices – Cluj-Napoca. http://transnationalfamilies.ro/dealing-with-difference-by-means-of-translational-families-practices/.
Zeitlyn, M. B. (2015). Visula methods in social research. London: Sage Publications.