Grażyna Liczbińska, Anna Kledzik, Renata Koziarska-Kasperczyk

Criteria of Partner Selection and Factors Influencing the Age at Marriage in the Poznań Province in the 19th and Early 20th Centuries

Grażyna Liczbińska, Anna Kledzik, Renata Koziarska-Kasperczyk


Article information

Volume: XII Issue: 1, Pages: 5-22
Grażyna Liczbińska, Anna Kledzik, Renata Koziarska-Kasperczyk
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Anthropology, Poznań, Poland
grazyna@amu.edu.pl


Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the criteria of the selection of marriage partners in 19th and early 20th century Polish lands, focusing on the example of the Poznań province. Individual information about partners was derived from parish and civil marriage registers for 1840-1919 (8,780 couples). In the Poznań province the criteria of partner selection were age, religious denomination, occupational status of spouses and the size of their place of residence. Men with a higher social position married relatively young women. The social and economic position of women were less important in partner selection than those of men. Factors of socio-economic nature influenced the age of spouses entering into matrimony for the first time.

Keywords: occupation, social status, place of residence, marital status, religious denomination

References

Anderson, R. C. and  Klofstad, C. A. (2012). “For Love or Money? The Influence of Personal Resources and Environmental Resource Pressures on Human Mate Preferences”. Ethology 118: 841–849.

Back, M. D., Penke, L. , Schmukle, S.C. , Sachse, K., Borkenau, P., and Asendorpf, E. B. (2011). “Why mate choices are not as reciprocal as we assume: The role of personality, flirting and physical attractiveness”. European Journal of Perception 25: 120–132.

Blond, A. (2008). “Impacts of exposure to images of ideal bodies on male body dissatisfaction: A review”. Body Image 5(3): 244–250.

Botwin, M.D., Buss, D.M., and Shackelford, J. K. (1997). “Personality and mate preference Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction”. Journal of Personality 65(1): 107–136 .

Brewer G., Archer, J., and Manning, J. (2007). “Physical attractiveness: The objective ornament and subjective self-ratings”. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 5(1-4): 29–38.

Brodnicka, E. (1969). “Ludność parafii Wieleń nad Notecią w drugiej połowie XVIII wieku. Rekonstrukcje rodzin”. Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski 3: 179–202.

Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D., and Kenrick, D. T. (2002). “Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels”. Personal Relationships  9: 271–278.

Buss, D.M. (1989). “Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 Cultures”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12(1): 1–49.

Buss, M. D., Schmitt, D. P. (1993). “Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating”. Psychological Review 100(2): 204–232.

Chu S., Farr, F., Muñoz, L.C., and Lycett, .E. J. (2011). “Interpersonal trust and market value moderates the bias in women’s preferences away from attractive high-status men”. Personality and Individual Differences 51(2):143–147.

Currie, T.E. and Little, A. C. (2009). “The relative importance of the face and body in judgments of human physical attractiveness”. Evolution and Human Behavior 30(6): 409–46.

Daszkiewicz-Ordyłowska, D. (1995). “Śluby w parafii toszeckiej w latach 1789–1877”. Śląskie Studia Demograficzne 117: 47–67.

Domżol, M. (2002). “Ocena stanu puli genów na podstawie analizy odległości małżeńskich w populacjach wiejskich z mikroregionu Ostrowa Lednickiego na przełomie XIX i XX wieku”. Studia Lednickie 7: 127–141.

Ha, T., Overbeek, G., and Engels, R.C.M.E. (2010). “Effects of attractiveness and social status on dating desire in heterosexual adolescents: An experimental study”. Archives of Sexual Behavior 39(5): 1063–1071.

Gage, J. and Hancock, D. 2002. “Where’s the money honey: The Socioeconomic effects of mate choice”. http://www.freeloadmps.com, 10.08.2010.

Golde, G. (1975). Catholics and Protestants. Agricultural Modernization in Two German Villages. New York: Academic Press.

Gȕnter, J. H., Hortaçsu, A., Ariely, D. (2010). “Matching and Sorting in Online Dating”. American Economic Review 100(1): 30–163.

Hatfield, E., and Rapson, R. L. (1996). Love and Sex: Cross Cultural Perspective. Needham Height, Mass: Simon and Schuster.

Hume, D.K. and Montgomerie, R. (2001). “Facial attractiveness signals different aspects of “quality” in women and men”. Evolution and Human Behavior  22(2): 93–112.

Iluk, K. (1998). “Ludność parafii Witków Śląski w latach 1851-1898”. Śląskie Studia  Demograficzne 5: 7–62.

Kemkes-Grottenthaler, A. (2003).” More than a Leap of Faith: The Impact of Biological and Religious Correlates on Reproductive Behavior”. Human Biology 75(5): 705–727.

Kenrick, D. T. and Keefe, R. C. (1992). “Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15(01): 75–133.

Kędelski, M. (1986). “Ewolucja umieralności i trwania życia ludności miasta Poznania w wiekach XIX i XX”. Studia Demograficzne 2(84): 3–27.

Kędelski, M. 1992. Rozwój demograficzny Poznania w XVIII i na początku XIX wieku Poznań: Akademia Ekonomiczna w Poznaniu.

Kędelski, M. (1994). Stosunki ludnościowe w latach 1815–1918. In J. Topolski,  L. Trzeciakowski (Eds.). Dzieje Poznania 1793–1918. Vol. 2. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, pp. 222-270.

Knodel, J.(1988). Demographic Behavior in the Past: A Study of Fourteen German Village Population in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 Kowalska-Glikmann, S. (1971). “Ruchliwość społeczna i zawodowa mieszkańców Warszawy w latach 1845-1861”. Warszawa: Instytut Historii PAN.

Kozłowski, J. (2004). Wielkopolska pod zaborem pruskim w latach 1815–1918. Poznań 200: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.

Kwapulińska, P. (1995). “Śluby w parafii kochłowickiej w XIX wieku”. Śląskie Studia Demograficzne 117: 69–109.

Lee, R. (2000). “Labour Market Constraints and the Integration of Urban inmi-grants: The Case of Bremen, 1815-1914”. In R. Leboutte (Ed.), Migrations and Migrants in Historical Perspective. Permanencies and Innovations. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 165-205.

Liczbińska, G. (2009 a). Umieralność i jej uwarunkowania wśród katolickiej i ewangelickiej ludności historycznego Poznania. Poznań: Biblioteka Telgte.

Liczbińska, G. (2009 b). “Infant and Child Mortality among Catholics and Lutherans in Nineteenth century Poznań”. Journal of Biosocial Science 41(5): 661–683.

Liczbińska, G. (2011). “Ecological Conditions vs. Religious Denomination. Mortality Among Catholics and Lutherans in Nineteenth-Century Poznań”. Human Ecology 39: 795–806.

Liczbińska, G. (2012). “Marriage patterns among Lutherans from the parish of Trzebosz in the second half of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century”. The History of the Family 17(2): 236–255.

Liczbińska, G. (2015). Lutherans in the Poznań province. Biological dynamics of the Lutheran population from the 19th century and early 20th centuries. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač.

Liczbińska. G. (2016). “Die Heiratsmuster von Lutheranern im Regierungsbezirk Posen in der zweiten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts”. In C. Kraft, M. Krzoska, I. Röskau-Rydel (Eds.). Zwischen Geschlecht und Nation. Interdependenzen und Interaktionen in der multiethnischen Gesellschaft Polens im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert.  Osnabrűck: Fibre Verlag, pp. 153-167.

Liczbińska, G. (2017). “Between religion and environment. Mortality and its causative factors in Greater Poland in the 19th century”. Historical Social Research 42(2): 114–133.

Liczbińska, G., Syska,  E., Koziarska-Kasperczyk, R., and Kledzik, A. (2018). “An urban family in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries: pilot studies of marital fertility and Poznań families conducted on the basis of domicile files included in the Municipal Records of the city residents”. Journal of International History (Forthcoming).

Logan, J. A. , Hoff P. D., and Newton, M. A. (2007). “Two-Sided Estimation of Mate Preferences for Similarities in Age, Education, and Religion”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 103(482): 559–569.

Makowski, K.(1992). Rodzina poznańska w I połowie XIX wieku. Poznań: Wydawnictwo UAM.

Marcus, D.K. and Miller, R.S. (2003). “Sex differences in judgments of physical attractiveness: a social, relations analysis”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29(3): 325–335.

Mare, R. D. (1991). “Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating”. American Sociological Review 56(1): 15–32.

McQuillan, K. (1999). Culture, Religion, and Demographic Behaviour: Catholics and Lutherans in Alsace, 1750–1970. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Mikulski, K. (2002). “Strategie rodzinne rzeźników toruńskich w XVII-XVIII wieku”. Roczniki Dziejów Gospodarczych i Społecznych 62: 49–84.

Modrzewska, K. (1948). “Parafia Mełgiew jako biologiczny krąg izolacyjny”. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie – Skłodowska 3(sectio B): 79–140.

Noë, R. and Hammerstein, P. (1994). “Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating”. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 35(1):1–11.

Oris, M. (1996). “Fertility and migration in the heart of the industrial revolution”. The History of the Family 1(2): 169–182.

Oris, M. (2000). “The Age at Marriage of Migrants During the Industrial Revolution in the Region of Liège”. The History of the Family 5(4): 391–413.

Pawłowski, B. and Dunbar, R. I. M. (1999). “Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 266(1416): 281–285.

Piasecki, E. (1990). Ludność parafii bejskiej (woj. kieleckie) w świetle ksiąg metrykalnych z XVIII–XX w. Warszawa: PWN.

Puch, E. A. (1993). “Dynamika biologiczna polskich społeczności wiejskich z różnych systemów ekologiczno-kulturowych w XVIII i XIX wieku”.  Przegląd Antropologiczny 56: 5-35.

Rand, C.S. and Hall, J.A. (1983). “Sex differences in the accuracy of self-perceived attractiveness”. Social Psychology Quarterly 46(4): 359-363.

Rejman, S. (2006). Ludność podmiejska Rzeszowa w latach 1784–1880. Studium demograficzno-historyczne. Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego.

Shackelford, T.K., Schmitt, D.P., and Buss, D.M. (2005). “Universal dimensions of mate preferences”. Personality and Individual Differences 39(2): 447-458.

Sharlin, A. (1978). “Natural Decrease in Early Modern Cities: A Reconsideration”. Past & Present 79(1): 126–138.

Spychała,  J. (1995). “Śluby w parafii Strzelce Opolskie w latach 1766-1870”. Śląskie Studia Demograficzne  118: 7–44.

STATISTICA version 13.1. StatSoft, Inc. 2017, www.statsoft.com.

Stevens, G. Owens, D., Schaefer, E. C.  (1990). “Education and Attractiveness in Marriage Choices”. Social Psychology Quarterly 53(1): 62–70.

Swami V., Frederick, D.A., Aavik, T., Alcalay, L., Allik, J. et al. (2010). “The attractive female body weight and female body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: results of the international body project I”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(3): 309–325.

Trzeciakowska, M. and Trzeciakowski, L. (1987). W dziewiętnastowiecznym Poznaniu. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.

Viegas de Andrade, C. (2010). “Marriage patterns in 19th-century Vila de Conde: The study of an urban centre in northwest Portugal”. The History of the Family 15(1): 34–54.

Wajda, K. (1980). “Uwagi do wytycznych”. Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski 12: 193–200.

Warach, A. (2013). “Wiek zawierania małżeństw wśród ubogich i zamożnych katolików z XIX-wiecznego Poznania”. Poznański Rocznik Archiwalno-Historyczny 16: 111–124.

Welling, L. L. M., Jones, B. C., and DeBruine, L. M. (2008). “Sex drive is positively associated with women’s preferences for sexual dimorphism in men’s and women’s faces”. Personality and Individual Differences 44(1): 161–170.

Wikipedia 2017. “Rozbiory Polski”. https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/.

Zielińska, A. (2012). Przemiany struktur demograficznych w Toruniu w XIX i na początku XX wieku. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.