“Minding the gap” in the research on human trafficking for sexual purposes
Rafaela Hilário Pascoal
Volume: XI Issue: 1, Pages 79-92
Rafaela Hilário Pascoal
PhD student, University of Palermo, Italy
Since the signature of the United Nations Trafficking Protocol in December 2000 that human trafficking has been labeled as a transnational, complex criminal phenomenon. However, despite the implementation of international soft law instruments to tackle the phenomenon, human trafficking is constantly evolving by the frequent changes of strategies, routes, types of exploitation and methodologies applied by the criminal networks. This flexibility of the phenomenon does not only difficult the implementation of effective tackling measures, but it also demonstrates to be an obstacle to produce accurate information on the subject (Cusick et al. 2009). Therefore, this paper aims to analyse the implementation of qualitative research on human trafficking for sexual purposes by 1) the identification of the obstacles on the research; 2) the application of an ethical conduct during the research; 3) the problematic of the participative observation method on the sexual exploitation.
Keywords: Sexual exploitation; Qualitative research; Participant Observation; Ethical issues; Human Trafficking
Arthur, S., and Nazroo, J. (2003). “Designing Fieldwork Strategies and Materials”. In Ritchie, J., Lewis, J. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (p. 137). London: Sage Publications.
Agustin, L. (2007). Sex at the Margins. Migration, Labour Markets and the Rescue Industry. London: Zed Press.
Barry, Kathleen L. (1995). The Prostitution of Sexuality. New York: New York Press.
Berman, J. (2003). “(Un)popular strangers and crises (Un)bounded: discourses of sex-trafficking, the European political community and the panicked State of the modern State”. European Journal of International Relations 9(1): 37–86.
Brennan, D. (2005). “Methodological challenges in research with trafficked persons: Tales from the field”. International Migration 43 (1–2): 35–54
Brunovskis, A., Surtees, R. (2008). “Agency and illness. The Conceptualization of trafficking victims’ choices and behaviours in the assistance system”. Gender, Technology and Development 1: 53–76.
Brunovskis, A., and Surtees, R. (2010). “Untold stories: Biases and selection effects in research with victims of trafficking for sexual exploitation”. International Migration 48 (4): 1–37.
Coy, M. (2006). “This morning I’m a researcher, this afternoon I’m an outreach worker: Ethical dilemmas in practitioner research international journal of social research methodology”. Theory and Practice 9 (5): 419–432.
Kelly, Liz and Coy, Maddy (2016). “Ethics as Process, Ethics in Practice: Researching the Sex Industry and Trafficking”. In Siegel, D., de Wildt, R. (eds). Ethical Concerns in Research on Human Trafficking. Berlin: Springer, pp. 33-50
Cusick, L., Kinnell, H., Brooks-Gordon, B., Campbell, R. (2009). “Wild guesses and conflated meanings? Estimating the size of the sex worker population in Britain”. Critical Social Policy 29(4): 703–719.
Denzin, K., Lincoln, S. (eds). (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Doezema, J. (2005). “Now You See Her, Now You Don’t: Sex Workers at the UN Trafficking Protocol Negotiation”. Social and Legal Studies 14: 61-89.
Easton, H., Matthews, R. (2016). “Getting the Balance Right: The Ethics of Researching Women Trafficked for Commercial Sexual Exploitation”. In Siegel, D., de Wildt, R. (eds). Ethical Concerns in Research on Human Trafficking, Berlin: Springer, pp. 11-32.
Gallagher, A. (2010). The International Law of Human Trafficking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gorman, G. E., Clayton, P. (2005). Qualitative Research for the Information Professional (2nd ed.). London: Facet Publishing.
Goździak, E. M, Bump, M. N. (2008). “Data and Research on Human Trafficking: Bibliography of Research-Based Literature”. Georgetown University: M.A. Institute for the Study of International Migration, Walsh School of Foreign Service.
Haggerty, K. (2004). “Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics”. Qualitative Sociology 27(4): 391-414.
Hughes, D. (2000). “The Natasha Trade: The Transnational Shadow Market of Trafficking in Women”. Journal of International Affairs 53 (2): 1-18.
Janssen, M.-L. (2007). Reizende sekswerkers: Latijns—Amerikaanse vrouwen in de Europese prostitutie (Traveling sex-workers: Latin American women in the European prostitution). Apeldoorn: Het Spinhuis.
IOM (2014). Trafficker and Trafficking. Challenges in researching human traffickers and traffickers operations. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.
Jordan, A. (2002). The Annotated Guide to the Annoted Guide to Complete UN Trafficking Protocol. Washington, DC: International Human Rights Law Group
Kempandoo, K. (1998). Introduction. Globalizing Sex Workers Rights. In Kempandoo, K., Doezema, J. (eds). Global Sex Workers. Rights, Resistance and Redefinition, New York: Routledge.
Laczko, F. (2005). “Introduction”. In Laczko, F., Gozdziak, E. (eds). Data and Research on Human Trafficking: A Global Survey. Geneva: International Organization for Migration, pp. 5-16.
Lo Iacono, E (2014). “Victims, sex workers and perpetrators: gray areas in the trafficking of Nigerian women”. Trends in Organized Crime 17(1): 110-128.
Maxwell, J. (1997). “Designing a qualitative study”. In Bickman, L., Rog, D. J. (eds.) Handbook of applied social research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 69-100.
Melrose, M. (2002). “Labour pains: Some considerations on the difficulties of researching juvenile prostitution”. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 4(4): 333–351.
Sarantakos, S. (2005). Social Research (3rd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Siegel, D., Bovenkerk, F. (2000). “Crime and manipulation of identity among Russian-speaking immigrants in the Netherlands”. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 16(4): 424-444.
Siegel, D. (2004). “Russische Maffia in Nederland?! Participerende observatie in een gevaarlijke gemeenschap. Kwalon 9(2): 40–45.
Siegel, D. (2005). Russische biznis. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.
Singleton, R. A., Straits, B. C. (2005). Approaches to Social Research (4th ed.). New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Siegel, D., Yesilgoz, Y. (2003). “Natashas and Turkish men: New trends in women trafficking and prostitution”. In Siegel, D., Van de Bunt, H., Zaitch, D. (eds). Global organized crime. Trends and developments. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic: 73–84.
Snape, D., Spencer, L. (2003). “The foundations of qualitative research”. In Ritchie, J., Lewis, J. (eds). Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage Publications.
Tyldum, G., Brunovskis, A. (2005). “Describing the Unobserved: Methodological Challenges in Empirical Studies on Human Trafficking”. International Migration 43(1/2): 17-34.
Tyldum, G. (2010). “Limitations in research on human trafficking”. International Migration, 48 (5): 1–13.
United Nations Inter-Agency Project on Human Trafficking. (2008). Guide to ethics and human rights in counter-trafficking: Ethical standards for counter-trafficking research and programming.
Wildt, De Roos (2016). “Ethnographic Research on the Sex Industry: The Ambivalence of Ethical Guidelines”. In Siegel, D., de Wildt, R. (eds). Ethical Concerns in Research on Human Trafficking. New York: Springer, pp. 51-69.
Zimmermann, C., Watts, C. (2004). Risks and responsibilities: Guidelines for interviewing trafficked women. Lancet 363 (9408): 565.
Zimmerman, C., Hossain, M., Yun, K., Roche, B., Morison, L., Watts, C. (2006). “Stolen smiles: A summary report on the physical and psychological health consequences of women and adolescents trafficked in Europe”. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.