Online/Offline Couple Interviews in the Study of Transnational Families
Volume: XI Issue: 1, Pages: 107-120
Babeş-Bolyai University, Centre for Population Studies, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
This essay-type article aims to highlight some novel aspects we have confronted while using the named interview type as a data collection tool. Thus, in this paper we present, on the one hand, the sensitive elements in employing this type of interview: the argument for introducing these in experimental design; recruitment of participants and data protection; types of data obtained. On the other hand, we have signalled two exceptional aspects within couple interviews: the role of one of the partners as interviewer and the unveiling of family secrets through couple interviews. Through this article, we wish to draw the attention of researchers on this type of data collection as a useful tool in the study of families in general and of transnational families in particular.
Keywords: couple, joint, interview, data collection, online, offline, video, practices, families, transnational
Bjornholt, M., Farstad, G. R. (2014). “‘Am I rambling?’ On the advantages of interviewing couples together”. Qualitative Research 14 (1): 3-19.
Deakin, H. & Wakefield, K (2014). “Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers”. Qualitative Research 14 (5): 603–616.
Ducu, V. (2016). “Displaying Ethnically Mixed Families in Transylvania”. Transylvanian Review (Suppliment 2). Telegdi-Csetri, Á. (ed.). Cosmopolitanism and Difference: Politics and Critique, pp. 31-43.
Hertz, R.. (1995). “Separate But Simultaneous Interviewing of Husbands and Wives: Making Sense of Their Stories”. Qualitative Inquiry 1(4): 429-451.
Hine, C. (2004). “Social Research Methods and the Internet: A Thematic Review”. Sociological Research Online 9(2). http://www.socresonline.org.uk /9/2/hine.html> doi:10.5153/sro.924, last view 10.01.2017.
Janghorban, R., Latifnejad Roudsari R., Taghipour A. (2014). “Skype interviewing: The new generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research”. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.24152.
Mellor, R. M., Slaymaker, E., Cleland, J., (2013). “Recognizing and Overcoming Challenges of Couple Interview Research”. Qualitative Health Research 23 (10): 1399-1407.
Morgan, D. (2011). “Locating ‘Family Practices”. Sociological Research Online 16 (4):1-14.
Morgan, D. (2011). “Rethinking Family Practices”. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Morgan, D. L., Ataie, J., Carder, P., Hoffman, K., (2013). “Introducing Dyadic Interviews as a Method for Collecting Qualitative Data”. Qualitative Health Research 23(9): 1276 – 1284.
Norlyk, A., Haahr, A., Hall, E. (2016). “Interviewing with or without the partner present? – an underexposed dilemma between ethics and methodology in nursing research”. Journal of Advanced Nursing 72(4): 936–945.
Polak, L., Green, J. (2015). “Using Joint Interviews to Add Analytic Value”. Qualitative Health Research 26 (12): 1638-1648.
Seale, C., Charteris-Black, J., Dumelow, C., Locock, L., Ziebland, S. (2008). “The Effect of Joint Interviewing on the Performance of Gender”. Field Methods 20 (2): 107–128.
Taylor, B., de Vocht, H. (2011). “Interviewing Separately or as Couples? Considerations of Authenticity of Method”. Qualitative Health Research 21 (11): 1576–1587.