Ahbab Mohammad Fazle Rabbi, Mohammed Kabir, Russell Kabir

What Went Wrong with the Achievement of Replacement Fertility in Bangladesh and Its Consequences on the Demographic Dividend: The Role of Proximate Determinants?

Ahbab Mohammad Fazle Rabbi, Mohammed Kabir, Russell Kabir


Article information

Volume: XII Issue: 1, Pages: 103-126
Ahbab Mohammad Fazle Rabbi, Mohammed Kabir, Russell Kabir
https://doi.org/10.24193/RJPS.2018.1.06
Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Padua, Italy, Department of Statistics, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh, Department of Medical Science & Public Health, Anglia Ruskin University, UK
fazlerabbi@stat.unipd.it
kabirm46@yahoo.co.uk
russell.kabir@anglia.ac.uk


Abstract

According to 2010 World Population Prospects (WPP), Bangladesh is passing the second phase of fertility transition. The recent fertility level (TFR) of Bangladesh is 2.3 births per woman. The Bangladesh Demographic & Health Survey (BDHS)-2014 data showed that fertility is stalled again since BDHS-2011 unexpectedly. This stagnation raises questions about the prospect of reaching replacement fertility which was supposed to be achieved in Bangladesh by 2015 but failed again. This also has implications on the demographic window and consequently on the demographic dividend. Using the data of BDHS-2014 and applying the Bongaarts framework of the proximate determinants of fertility, this study attempts to identify the factors responsible for not achieving replacement fertility yet. The results demonstrate that contraception still dominates the fertility reduction in Bangladesh, followed by lactational infecundability, marriage and induced abortion. The change in the level of the proximate determinants and other key factors showed that fertility did not change much since BDHS-2011 which possibly caused this stagnation. The important factor which may have contributed to this is the high proportion of adolescent marriage in Bangladesh. This factor still creates a higher value of index of marriage which in turn affects fertility rates. Simulation on proportion married at adolescent age group suggests policy implications for achieving replacement fertility in Bangladesh can be achieved. In addition, the role of abortion and its measurement problem are also discussed.

Keywords: Bangladesh, proximate determinants of fertility, nuptiality, fertility stagnation

References

Alkema, L., Raftery, A., Gerland, P., Clark, S., Pelletier, F., Buettner, T., and Heilig, G. (2011). “Probabilistic Projections of the Total Fertility Rate for All Countries”. Demography 48(3): 815-839.

Bongaarts, J. (1978) “A framework for the analysis of the proximate determinants of fertility”. Population and Development Review 4(1): 105–132.

Bongaarts, J. (1982) “The fertility-inhibiting effects of the intermediate fertility variables”. Studies in Family Planning 13(6/7): 179-189.

Bongaarts, J., Frank, O. and Lesthaeghe, R. (1984) “The proximate determinants of fertility in sub-Saharan Africa”. Population and Development Review 10(3): 511-537.

Bongaarts, J. and Potter, R. G. (1983). Fertility, biology and behavior: Analysis of the proximate determinants of fertility. New York: Academic Press.

Bongaarts, J. and Watkins, S. C. (1996). “Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions”. Population and Development Review 22(4): 639–682.

Caldwell, J. C., Khuda, B. E., Caldwell, B. C., I. Pieris, I., and Caldwell, P. (1999) The Bangladesh fertility decline: An interpretation. Population and Development Review 25(1): 67–84.

International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B) (1996) Fertility Intention and Subsequent Abortion in Matlab, Bangladesh. ICDDR,B, Dhaka.

Islam, M. A., Islam, M. M., and Chakraborty, N. (2002) Achieving Replacement Level Fertility in Bangladesh: Challenges and Prospects. Paper 18, CPD-UNFPA Programme on Population and Sustainable Development, CPD, Dhaka.

Islam, M. M., Dorvlo A. S. S., and Al-Qasmi, A. M. (2011) “Proximate determinants of declining fertility in Oman in the 1990s”. Canadian Studies in Population 38(3-4): 133–152.

Islam, M. M., Mamun, A. A., and Bairagi, R. (1998) “The proximate determinants of fertility in Bangladesh: Evidence from BDHS 1993-94”. Asia-Pacific Population Journal 13 (3): 3-22.

Islam, M. N. and Islam, M. M. (1993) “Biological and behavioral determinants of fertility in Bangladesh: 1975-1989”. Asia-Pacific Population Journal 8(1): 3-18.

Kabir, M. and Uddin, M. M. (1987) “Effect of nuptiality, contraception and breast-feeding on fertility in Bangladesh”. Journal of Biosocial Science 19(3): 345-350.

Johnston, H. B. and Hill, K. H. (1996) “Induced Abortion in the developing world: Indirect estimates”. International Family Planning Perspectives 22(3): 108-114.

National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), Mitra and Associates, and ICF International (2016). Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Dhaka, Bangladesh and Rockville, Maryland, USA.

National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), Mitra and Associates, and ICF International (2013). Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2011. Dhaka, Bangladesh and Calverton, Maryland, USA.

Rabbi, A. M. F. (2015). “Do increasing legal age at marriage and increased use of contraception will matter to achieve demographic goal: Revisiting the role of proximate determinants in Bangladesh”. Bangladesh Journal of Scientific Research 28(1): 27-34.

Salway, S., Roy, N. C., and Koenig, M. A. (1993) Levels and Trends in Post-partum Amenorrhea, Breastfeeding, and Birth: Results from WFS surveys. WFS Comparative Studies 40. Voorburg (Netherlands): ISI.

Simmons, G. B. (1985). Theories of fertility, in Fertility in Developing Countries: An Economic Perspective on Research and Policy Issues. London: Macmillan Press.

Stover, J. (1998). “Revising the Proximate Determinants of Fertility Framework: What Have We Learned in the Past 20 Years?”. Studies in Family Planning 29(3): 255-267.

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2011). World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision, Volume I: Comprehensive Tables. New York, NY: UN.

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2017). World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Methodology of the United Nations Population Estimates and Projections, Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.250. New York: United Nations.

Wang, S. X., Chen, Y. D., Charles, H. C., Chen, R. W., Rochat, L.P., and Rider, R. V. (1987). “Proximate determinants of fertility and policy implementation in Beijing”. Studies in Family Planning 18 (1): 222–228.