Ioan-Silviu Vîrva
Social Inequalities and the Evolution of Social Sustainability in Romania (2008–2024)
Ioan-Silviu Vîrva
Article Information
Pages: 59-80
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24193/RJPS.2026.1.03
*Ioan-Silviu Vîrva
*Tehnical University of Cluj-Napoca, Environmental Engineering and Sustainable Development Entrepreneurship Departament, silviu.virva@yahoo.com
Abstract. This article investigates the relationship between social inequalities and social sustainability in Romania during the period 2008–2024, with reference to the objectives established under the Romanian National Sustainable Development Strategy 2030 (SNDDR 2030) and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals framework. The study adopts a quantitative research design based on secondary data obtained from the National Institute of Statistics and examines eight socio-economic indicators reflecting income distribution, poverty, social exclusion, material deprivation, social protection expenditures, economic performance, and labour productivity. Pearson correlation analysis, complemented by OLS diagnostic procedures, is employed to assess statistical associations among the selected variables and evaluate the robustness of the empirical results. The findings indicate substantial improvements across several dimensions of social sustainability, particularly regarding reductions in poverty and severe material deprivation. Social protection expenditures display the strongest associations with improvements in poverty- and exclusion-related outcomes, whereas labour productivity growth exhibits weak and statistically non-significant relationships with the social indicators included in the analysis. These results suggest that improvements in economic performance do not automatically translate into stronger social sustainability outcomes. When evaluated against the targets established by SNDDR 2030, Romania has made considerable progress in reducing poverty and social exclusion; however, the current pace of improvement remains insufficient to fully achieve several national commitments by 2030. In addition, the productivity slowdown observed toward the end of the study period may pose challenges for future employment growth and socio-economic convergence. Overall, the results highlight the importance of effective redistributive policies, broader social protection coverage, and sustained investment in the social dimension of sustainable development in order to strengthen long-term social sustainability in Romania.
Keywords: social inequality; social sustainability; AROPE; social protection; SDG monitoring; SNDDR 2030; Romania.
References
Adams, R.H., Jr. (2004). “Economic growth, inequality and poverty: Estimating the growth elasticity of poverty”. World Development 32(12): 1989–2014.
Antoniades, A., Antonarakis, A., Gilman, J., Kempf, I., Lan, L.L. (2021). “Special issue: The poverty‐inequality‐environment frontier in the age of crises”. Sustainable Development 29(3): 481–484.
Ballet, J., Bazin, D., Mahieu, F. (2020). “A policy framework for social sustainability: Social cohesion, equity and safety”. Sustainable Development 28(5): 1388–1394.
Berger-Schmitt, R. (2000). Social cohesion as an aspect of the quality of societies: Concept and measurement (EU Reporting Working Paper No. 14) [unpublished manuscript]. Mannheim: Centre for Survey Research and Methodology (ZUMA).
Cook, R.D. (1977). “Detection of influential observation in linear regression”. Technometrics 19(1): 15–18.
Croitoru, A. et al. (2025). “Social protection in Romania during the COVID-19 pandemic: Who received non-financial support and who was left out?”. Cogent Social Sciences 11(1): 2574407.
Cuthill, M. (2003). “The contribution of human and social capital to building community well-being: A research agenda relating to citizen participation in local governance in Australia”. Urban Policy and Research 21(4): 373–391.
Cuthill, M. (2010). “Strengthening the ‘social’ in sustainable development: Developing a conceptual framework for social sustainability in a rapid urban growth region in Australia”. Sustainable Development 18(6): 362–373.
Davies, M., Béné, C., Arnall, A., Tanner, T., Newsham, A., Coirolo, C. (2013). “Promoting resilient livelihoods through adaptive social protection: Lessons from 124 programmes in South Asia”. Development Policy Review 31(1): 27–58.
Dobrescu, P., Durach, F. (2019). “Unable to Stop Inequality from Rising: Evidence from Romania”. In Dobrescu, P. (ed). Development in Turbulent Times: The Many Faces of Inequality Within Europe. Cham: Springer, pp. 89–101.
Dumitrescu-Popa, S. (2024). “Economic inequality influences the trend of sustainability?”. Economic Convergence in European Union 169.
Eurostat. (2025). Government expenditure on social protection. Statistics Explained. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics_explained/index.php?title=Government_expenditure_on_social_protection
Frone, S. (2020). “Links and synergies of sustainable development objectives and policies”. Revista Tinerilor Economişti (The Journal of Young Economists) 17(35): 79–92.
Government of Romania, Department for Sustainable Development. (2018). Strategia naţională pentru dezvoltarea durabilă a României 2030 [National strategy for the sustainable development of Romania 2030]. https://insse.ro/cms/files/POCA/strategia_nationala_pentru_dezvoltarea_durabila_a_Romaniei_2030.pdf
Ikegami, M., Carter, M.R., Barrett, C.B., Janzen, S.A. (2016). Poverty traps and the social protection paradox (NBER Working Paper No. 22714) [unpublished manuscript]. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Jackson, T., Victor, P.A. (2021). “Confronting inequality in the ‘new normal’: Hyper-capitalism, proto-socialism, and post-pandemic recovery”. Sustainable Development 29(3): 504–516.
Koning, J. (2001). “Social sustainability in a globalizing world: Context, theory and methodology explored”. Proceedings of the UNESCO/MOST Meeting, The Hague, Netherlands, pp. 22–23.
Leal Filho, W. et al. (2022). “Barriers to institutional social sustainability”. Sustainability Science 17(6): 2615–2630.
Lehtonen, M. (2004). “The environmental–social interface of sustainable development: Capabilities, social capital and institutions”. Ecological Economics 49(2): 199–214.
Le Quéré, C. et al. (2020). “Temporary reduction in daily global CO₂ emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement”“. Nature Climate Change 10(7): 647–653.
Littig, B., Griessler, E. (2005). “Social sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory”. International Journal of Sustainable Development 8(1–2): 65–79.
Martin, A. et al. (2020). “Environmental justice and transformations to sustainability”. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 62(1): 19–30.
Munteanu, R.A. (2023). “Analysis of fulfillment of the objectives for sustainable development in Romania”. Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series 23(1): 1141–1148.
NIS [National Institute of Statistics]. (2023). Raport. Indicatori naționali pentru dezvoltare durabilă – Orizont 2030 [Report. National indicators for sustainable development – Horizon 2030]. https://insse.ro/cms/files/POCA/Raport-INDD-Orizont2030-27042023.pdf
Popa, L. (2023). “Geographical polarization of sustainable welfare in Romania: The unbearable lightness of inequality of opportunity”. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology 14(1): 1–32.
Preoteasa, M. (2016). “Groups and needs: Response of the social protection system in nowadays Romania”. Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială 55: 139–157.
Puiu, I. (2024). “Assessing Romania’s progress towards Sustainable Development Goals 8, 9, 10 and 12: A comparative analysis in the EU context”. Journal of Research and Innovation for Sustainable Society 6(2): 358–374.
Sârbu, R.M. (2015). “A study on Romania sustainable development”. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence 9(1).
Scutaru, C., Saman, C., Păuna, B. (2015). “The dynamics of household consumption in Romania during economic crisis”. Procedia Economics and Finance 22: 820–827.
Seyfang, G., Paavola, J. (2008). “Inequality and sustainable consumption: Bridging the gaps”. Local Environment 13(8): 669–684.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). New York: United Nations General Assembly.
Winston, N. (2022). “Sustainable community development: Integrating social and environmental sustainability for sustainable housing and communities”. Sustainable Development 30(1): 191–202.
Żuk, P. (2023). “The war in Ukraine: Consequences for the economy, labour class and equitable development in Europe and beyond”. The Economic an Labour Relations Review 34(2): 343–356.