Cornelia Mureșan

Effects of Education and of Union Type on Men’s Lifetime Fertility in Two Different Societal Contexts

Cornelia Mureșan


Article information

Volume: XI Issue: 2, Pages: 127-144
Cornelia Mureșan
Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty of Sociology and Social Work
cornelia.muresan@socasis.ubbcluj.ro


Abstract

There is a huge literature examining fertility trends and its determinants in low-fertility societies, but studies on men are rare even there is a general acceptance that the de-standardization of family life concerns especially men. We study the development of men’s lifetime fertility inside unions in former communist countries is contrasted with the more studied dynamic of male fertility in Nordic countries. The paper displays selected features of men’s fertility in six European countries over the period 1985-2004/2010, based on data from national Generations and Gender Surveys, and using duration-based total fertility rates in the spirit of parity-progression ratios developed by Hoem and Mureșan. We found that in former communist countries, where families are usually double-breadwinner type, but domestic cores and childbearing are rather women’s responsibilities, the negative effect of education on male fertility is more influential than the effect of more committed union types. By contrast, in modern societies, with more similar gender equality across welfare-state institutions, the ultimate fertility of men depends less on their educational attainment but more on their union patterns. We also show that in consensual union settings the effect of education is invariable negative, even if it is less significant in the Nordic countries. Only in Eastern Europe the mechanism of the effect of education on men’s marital fertility is driven via the educational attainment of their wives.

Keywords: male fertility, education, marital and cohabiting unions, former-communist countries, Generations and Gender Surveys.

References:

Baizan, P., Arpino, B., and Declòs, C. E. (2016). “The effect of gender policies on fertility: The moderating role of education and normative context”. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie 32: 1-30. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-015-9356-y

Dariotis, J. K., Pleck, J. H., Astone, N. M., and Sonenstein, F. L. (2011). “Pathways of early fatherhood, marriage, and employment: A latent class growth analysis”. Demography 48(2): 593-623.

Guzzo, K. B., and Hayford, S. R. (2010). “Single mothers, single fathers: Gender differences in fertility after a nonmarital birth”. Journal of Family Issues 31(7): 906-933.

Hoem, J. M., Kostova, D., Jasilioniene, A., and Mureşan, C. (2009). “Traces of the Second Demographic Transition in four selected countries in Central and Eastern Europe: Union formation as a demographic manifestation”. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie 25(3) 239-255.

Hoem, J. M., and Mureşan, C. (2011a). “An extension of the conventional TFR”. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie 27(4): 389-402.

Hoem, J. M., and Mureşan, C. (2011b). “The total marital fertility rate and its extensions”. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie 27(3): 295-312.

Joyner, K., Peters, H. E., Hynes, K., Sikora, A., Taber, J. R., and Rendall, M. S. (2012). “The quality of male fertility data in major U.S. surveys”. Demography 49: 101-124.

Kravdal, Ø., and Rindfuss, R. R. (2008). “Changing relationships between education and fertility: A study of women and men born 1940 to 1964”. American Sociological Review 73(5): 854-873.

Lappegård, T., and Rønsen, M. (2013). “Socioeconomic differences in multipartner fertility among Norwegian men”. Demography 50(3): 1135-1153.

Pailhe, A., and Solaz, A. (2012). “The influence of employment uncertainty on childbearing in France: A tempo or quantum effect?”. Demographic-Research 26(1): 1-40. http://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2012.26.1.

Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Kreyenfeld, M., Lappegård, T., Keizer, R., and Berghammer, C. (2010). “The educational gradient of childbearing within cohabitation in Europe”. Population and Development Review 36(4): 775-801.

Pfau-Effinger, B. (2004). Development of culture, welfare states and women’s employment in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Schober, P., and Scott, J. (2012). “Maternal employment and gender role attitudes: dissonance among British men and women in the transition to parenthood”. Work, Employment & Society 26(3): 514-530.

Tragaki, A., and Bagavos, C. (2014). “Male fertility in Greece: Trends and differentials by education level and employment status”. Demographic-Research 31(6): 137-160. http://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.6.

Trimarchi, A., and Van Bavel, J. (2015). “Education and the Transition to Fatherhood: the Role of Selection into Union”. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, San Diego, CA.

Vere, J. P. (2008). “The perils of father-reported fertility data for household labour supply models”. Population Studies 62(2): 235-243.

Vignoli, D., Drefahl, S., and De Santis, G. (2012). “Whose job instability affects the likelihood of becoming a parent in Italy? A tale of two partners”. Demographic Research 26(2): 41–62.

Widmer, E. D., and Ritschard, G. (2009). “The de-standardization of the life course: Are men and women equal?”. Advances in Life Course Research, 14(1): 28-39.

Wiik, K. A., Keizer, R., and Lappegård, T. (2012). “Relationship quality in marital and cohabiting unions across Europe”. Journal of Marriage and Fertility 74(3): 389-398.

Zhang, L. (2011). Male fertility patterns and determinants. Dordrecht: Springer.